Writing in 2019 feels like a struggle,
so just to get going again I'm coughing up a short text on feedback.
I know I already wrote about critique, but this is also about
positive things (I promise!). Here goes...
As you all know, we get a lot of
feedback, and a lot of it is stupid in my opinion. For me, stupid
feedback means comments that are vague, jumping to conclusions, and
therefore unhelpful. I don't think people give such feedback on
purpose – but we have a tendency to forget that our thoughts aren't
audible to other people. Just our words. Also I think music being
Great Art creates the need to be all poetic and soulful when
commenting on it. Feedback easily slides to the Higher Realms of
interpretation, emotions, expressions et cetera, instead of the lowly
ways the pianists, for example, choose to push the wooden keys with
their mundane little fingers. And one more thing leading the
commentators astray: we see other people through our own unique
experiences, tending to interpret their behaviour as if they were
like us. So if someone acts in a way you would act if you were
feeling shy, you probably think that they're feeling shy as well. If
they really are feeling shy, then that's great, well observed you!
But if they're not shy after all, and instead this is their
concentrated face or their tired face, then oops. You go and tell
them there's no need for shyness here, and you'll baffle them for
sure.
Anyhow, my purpose of writing this is
to call for more simplicity, and I seem to be doing the very opposite
here. So I'd better move on to some examples now.
Stupid feedback: ”You should express
yourself more freely.”
Great feedback: ”To me it sounds like
your playing lacks dynamic range and agogics – why not try to
exaggerate the dynamic differences and rubatos to make the music less
rigid?”
***
Stupid feedback: ”The melody should
sing more.”
Great feedback: ”Your legato isn't
ideal, because you're interrupting it with unnecessary hand
movements. Here's how you could try to move your hand...”
***
Stupid feedback: ”Such a sensitive
accompanist!”
Great feedback: ”What a good
accompanist – he matched his dynamics so well with the singer, and
played with such clever rubatos that it sounded like they were really
breathing together.”
***
Stupid feedback: ”You need to be more
together!”
Great feedback: ”More eye contact!
When you look at each other more often, it makes you look like a
team.”
Maybe it's just me, but I'd prefer the latter any day. So what do you think? What is good feedback to you?
No comments:
Post a Comment